For
the Redskins, 2012 was the year of RG3. In
March, the team decided to go all-in on Robert Griffin III, trading three first
round picks and a second round pick to St. Louis in order to move up to number
two in the draft.
Additionally,
the NFL fined the Redskins $36 million in cap space because of contract
structures during the uncapped season. With
less cap space and no top draft picks for the next two seasons, Griffin’s
success became paramount for the Redskins to become competitive in the near
future.
He
did not disappoint.
Griffin
finished with 3,200 yards, a 65.6 completion percentage, and 27 total
touchdowns. He also threw for only five interceptions, displaying accuracy and
decision making capabilities well beyond his years. Both he and surprise
running back Alfred Morris transformed the offense this season and everyone
bought in on the feeling that this team had the makings of something special.
The
season did not start out as many had hoped, as the team dropped to 3-6 heading
into the bye week. Mike Shanahan then made his now famous comments about how it
was time to evaluate his players to determine who would remain in the years to
come, making everyone believe he had given up hope on the season.
The
team, however, did not. They returned from the bye and proceeded to win the
remaining seven games on the schedule, including a 28-18 win over Dallas in the
season finale to earn their first NFC East division championship since 1999.
The
Redskins now prepare for a wildcard matchup with Seattle as they hope to extend
their storybook season.
New
Year’s Resolution: Keep RG3 healthy and
get defensive personnel to match the talent on offense.
The
Nationals also saw their team carried into the postseason by their young
talent. After a much improved 2011 season in which the team finished with a
80-81 record, the Nationals compiled a roster with the expectations of
competing for the division in 2012.
In
addition to the return of ace Stephen Strasburg, the team also debuted a
rotation featuring Gio Gonzalez, mainstay Jordan Zimmermann, Edwin Jackson, and
the surprising Ross Detwiler. The rotation quickly became the most dominant in
the MLB.
Though
the Nationals were hoping to further develop Bryce Harper in AAA, injuries
forced him into the lineup and he made his MLB debut on April 28 against the
Dodgers. Did he prove he belonged in the majors? “That’s a clown question, bro.”
The
Nationals compiled a record of 98-64, finishing with their first ever NL East
division title. In addition, Davey
Johnson was named NL manager of the year and Harper was named NL rookie of the
year. Strasburg, Gonzalez, Harper, and
Ian Desmond were all named NL All-Stars, the most since the team moved to DC.
The
Nationals met the St. Louis Cardinals in the divisional series, where Jayson
Werth provided perhaps the biggest moment in the history of the Nationals, a
walk-off homerun in game four to force a decisive game five.
Game
five of course had a very different outcome. After jumping out to a 6-0 lead, the Nationals
watched as the Cardinals chipped away until finally taking the lead with a
four-run ninth inning. It was a bitter end to a fantastic season.
Perhaps
the biggest story of all for the Nationals did not even take place on the
field. General Manager Mike Rizzo
adamantly declared that Strasburg would be kept on an innings limit after
returning from Tommy John surgery. Rizzo
was mostly ignored as no one expected the Nationals to be a legitimate World
Series contender, but his decision sparked weeks of debate as the shutdown
approached and the team sat atop the standings. In the end, Rizzo stuck to his guns and
Strasburg was pulled.
Clearly
hoping for another postseason run, the Nationals brought in Denard Span and Dan
Haren. They are also continuing their negotiations with Adam LaRoche in the
hopes of retaining him.
New
Year’s Resolution: Sign LaRoche, repeat as NL East champs, play Strasburg for a
full season including postseason, and make a deep playoff run.
While
2012 featured dream seasons for the Redskins and Nationals, the Wizards year
has been a nightmare.
The
end of the 2011-2012 season saw the Wizards in yet another lottery season, but
Ernie Grunfeld decided not to wait until the offseason to address some of the
team’s problems. In a three team trade, Grunfeld sent off locker room headaches
JaVale McGee and Nick Young and brought in Nene and Brian Cook. The move seemed
to work as the Wizards finished the season winning six straight.
In
July, the team also released Andray Blatche and brought in Emeka Okafor and
Trevor Ariza in a trade for Rashard Lewis. The organization declared loudly that they
were no longer a lottery team, largely based on the team’s assumption that Wall
would be playing.
In
September, the team announced that Wall had suffered a stress injury to his
knee and he would not be able to start the season. Without the key player the team had been built
around, the Wizards didn’t stand a chance and finished out 2012 with the worst
record in the NBA at 4-24.
New
Year’s Resolution: Get Wall back, avoid the worst record in NBA history, bring
in talent in the offseason.
The
Wizards might not be having a good season, but the Capitals haven’t had any
season at all. The NHL lockout has now stretched on at ridiculous length,
forcing the cancellation of all games from October through December and into
January.
As
slow as things may be now, the beginning of 2012 was very eventful. The Caps
found themselves struggling to transition from an offensive mentality to a
defensive one under new coach Dale Hunter. The team did manage to claw its way to
a seventh place finish and a matchup with Boston. Thanks to the emergence of young Braden Holtby
in goal, the Caps and Bruins played the closest playoff series in NHL history. Game seven went to overtime where Joel Ward
knocked in a rebound in one of the most exciting games in the history of the
organization.
The
Caps met an even tougher matchup in round two against the New York Rangers and
Ward went from hero to goat. In game
five with the series tied at two and the Caps holding onto a two-goal lead,
Ward was called for a double-minor high sticking penalty. The Rangers scored on both, including the
game-tying goal with 6.1 seconds left, and won in overtime. The Caps forced a game seven yet again, but
fell in Madison Square Garden.
At
the end of the season, Hunter decided to return to Ontario, so the reins were
passed to another former Caps’ captain, Adam Oates, who by now must be dying to
prove himself.
New
Year’s Resolution: PLAY!!!
In
another mad dash to the playoffs, DC United suddenly found themselves in dire
straits as leading scorer Dwayne De Rosario went down with a knee injury.
United led by head coach Ben Olsen, however, did not lose again for the rest of
the season and clinched their first playoff berth in five years. After a
thrilling victory over rival New York, United’s season came to an end in the
conference finals against Houston.
New
Year’s Resolution: Find consistency and return to the playoffs.
For the latest DC sports news, follow me on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
Wednesday, January 2, 2013
Tuesday, January 1, 2013
NFC East Champs Prepare for Wildcard Mathup
In his first professional season, Robert Griffin III has led the Redskins to a division title and hopefully, he’s not done yet.
The Redskins defeated the Cowboys 28-18 Sunday night to win the NFC East for the first time since 1999. Clearly playing at less than 100%, Griffin went 9 for 18 for only 100 yards, but rushed for 63 yards and a touchdown. Alfred Morris shouldered much of the load, with a spectacular performance rushing for 200 yards and 3 touchdowns.
The game put an exclamation point on a remarkable seven game winning streak to finish the season. It also showed just how bright the future is for this young team.
There is a clear difference this year as compared to 2007, when the Redskins last made the playoffs. While there was legitimate excitement over a return to the postseason, there was nothing really to build around. The Redskins were led by Jason Campbell, who inspired little confidence, and a rapidly aging Clinton Portis. There was no young core and little hope for the team to expand on their success.
Now, the Redskins have two budding superstars in Griffin and Morris and two leaders on defense in Brian Orakpo and Ryan Kerrigan. Finally, we are seeing a team built through the draft, rather than pieced together by costly, over the hill free agents.
The big question in terms of this season, is whether the Redskins con keep the streak alive. The Seattle Seahawks will come to FedEx Field this Sunday in the wildcard matchup. Seattle has eliminated the Redskins the last two times they were in the playoffs. They are also being led by a rookie QB who is having an incredible season.
Russell Wilson was selected in the third round of the 2012 draft by Seattle. He was expected to backup the newly acquired Matt Flynn, but Pete Carroll liked what he saw from the young rookie and decided to roll the dice. Wow, did it pay off.
Wilson has led the Seahawks to an 11-6 record, narrowly losing the NFC West championship to the 11-4-1 San Francisco 49ers. He threw for 3,118 yards, 26 touchdowns, and only 10 interceptions. He has also rushed for another 489 yards and four touchdowns. It would be an even more remarkable rookie season if there weren’t two other guys named Luck and Griffin also having amazing success.
Perhaps most importantly, Wilson has durability. Griffin on the other hand continues to heal. A week ago against Philadelphia, Griffin returned and stuck to the pocket. He still played a very good game, completing 16 of 24 for 198 yards, two touchdowns, and a QB rating of 102.4, but he only rushed for four yards. He was clearly limited in his mobility. He played a very different game against Dallas. Though still limited and lacking the break-away speed we have become accustomed to seeing, he still rushed six times for 63 yards. He really seemed to struggle passing, however. He completed only nine passes for 100 yards with a QB rating of 66.9.
It was clear very early on that the Redskins’ offensive gameplan against Dallas revolved around running the ball. Morris carried the ball a whopping 33 times. Still, Griffin’s regression in terms of passing is a little worrying. He only attempted 18 passes, but still completed 50%. Some of his incompletions were uncharacteristically inaccurate. His mobility may have improved, but his passing did not. Everyone is entitled to a bad game, even Griffin who really had not had one all season until Sunday. Perhaps that’s all it was, but when it follows an injury you have to wonder how much the injury may have affected him.
To be fair, Griffin was wearing a brace on his right knee. His knee may be feeling much better than we think, but those braces can really restrict a player’s movements. Griffin may be as fast as ever without the brace, but if he must continue to wear it, will it continue to affect his performance? Pierre Garcon has proven himself to be a key playmaker for this offense. If you can’t get him the ball, he can’t change the game for you.
After watching the Dallas game, I would expect Seattle to load the box and force Griffin to beat them through the air. Griffin has had no trouble beating teams deep, but he will need to be healthy. After another week of rest and healing, hopefully we will see the Griffin we’ve come to expect from week to week.
The Redskins and Seahawks have gone a combined 11-1 since week 11. They are two of the hottest teams in the NFL heading into these playoffs. These are the kind of streaks that carry teams deep into the postseason. Whoever wins this game on Sunday will have a legitimate shot to play in the Super Bowl.
Regardless of how this season may end for the Redskins, it has been a remarkable ride. Will the Redskins be able to maintain that one game, back against the wall attitude, or is there already a feeling of “mission accomplished” spreading through the locker room? If the Redskins can approach this game with the same determination and heart they have shown over the past seven games, then they will add yet another chapter to the already remarkable year 2012 has been.
For the latest DC sports news, follow me on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
Monday, December 24, 2012
Redskins Set to Meet Cowboys in Division Championship Matchup
The Redskins will wrap up the regular season next week with a game at home against the arch-rival Dallas Cowboys in a winner-take-all matchup for the NFC East division. It will be the first time the Redskins have ever hosted a head-to-head matchup to determine the division championship in the regular season finale. The loser could be out of the playoffs all together. Oh, and the game has been flexed to prime time.
Are the stakes high enough yet?
Perhaps the most storied rivalry in the NFL will add yet another momentous chapter next week as the two teams meet with the division on the line. The Redskins can turn the page on their recent ineptitude and the Cowboys can end the dream season of rookie quarterback Robert Griffin III, someone who is sure to be a thorn in their side for many years to come. After the beat-down Griffin subjected them to in Jerry World on Thanksgiving, the Cowboys would love nothing more than to ruin Griffin’s Christmas.
Still, regardless of what happens, one must not forget the hill the Redskins had to climb just to get to this point.
Just seven short weeks ago, the Redskins lost 21-13 to the lowly Carolina Panthers. It was the lowest point of the season. The team was playing terribly and Mike Shanahan was talking about evaluating the team for next year. Another season seemed lost.
Were the Redskins mathematically eliminated from the playoffs at 3-6? No, but I mean, they would have to pretty much win every game left on their schedule to have a realistic chance….
Only four other teams in the NFL have won 6 or more straight games this season, and all four of those teams have already punched their tickets to the playoffs. The last time the Redskins won six straight was in 1996 when Norv Turner was the coach. It is not an easy thing to do. Yet, it might not be good enough should the Redskins lose the finale.
As the game has been moved to prime time, the Redskins will know exactly what they are facing by kick off. If Minnesota or Chicago wins next week, then the Redskins will be eliminated with a loss to Dallas.
The Redskins, however, will not concern themselves with all the various scenarios. For them, it’s very simple: win and you’re in.
Dallas too has turned their season around after some early struggles. They began the season 3-5 and many wondered if head coach Jason Garrett’s days were numbered. Since then, they have won five of their last seven including two overtime wins. The Cowboys will not be a pushover.
The way this season has gone, I’m sure the Redskins wouldn’t have it any other way.
For the latest news on DC sports, follow me on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
For the latest news on DC sports, follow me on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
Friday, December 21, 2012
Wizards Walk Away from Deal for Harden
There
was a sense of cautious optimism surrounding the Wizards heading into the 2012-13
season. After a 3-20 start, however,
expectations have lowered considerably. John
Wall has yet to play and the roster has been exposed without him.
Do you think James Harden could have helped?
Last week, it was leaked by several anonymous sources that the Wizards passed up a deal for James Harden in the offseason. Sources vary on what Oklahoma City was asking for with some reports saying it would have taken Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and others saying the Thunder wanted an established player as part of the deal. The Wizards, however, walked away.
What was the issue? Money. The sources again vary on the specifics. The Washington Post reported that the Wizards would have been subject to the luxury tax with the addition of Harden’s contract. Other outlets reported that owner Ted Leonsis did not want to commit $80 million to Harden. Leonsis has come out and denied both reports.
I am always hesitant to argue that an owner is not committed to building a winning franchise, but this looks really bad. Owners are usually successful businessmen who are savvy enough to understand that winning teams put people in seats. There are always exceptions to the rule and I know there are dysfunctional franchises with terrible owners out there, but I have a hard time believing this is one of those cases.
Leonsis rebuilt the Capitals from one of the least profitable organizations to one of the most popular teams in the NHL. He did it by giving out big contracts to star players, but the team went through a lengthy rebuilding process to get there. I am sure the blueprint for the Wizards is probably pretty similar.
The problem is that the NBA is a different animal than the NHL. The NBA is the most star driven sports league in America. When you have the chance to bring one in at a relatively cheap price, you have to pull the trigger, especially when have no other way of attracting stars to come to the team.
Right now, there is no reason for a star player to sign in DC. The team is terrible and DC is not really considered a “basketball” town. When a star has a chance to sign with Miami, Boston, the Lakers, or Washington, in most cases the Wizards are going to be on the bottom of that list.
How do teams like Oklahoma City grow into a powerhouse? They draft a star to build around. Once that player establishes himself, it becomes easier to entice other players to sign with you. No doubt that was the team’s plan with Wall which makes the timing of his injury potentially devastating. The third year is often a make or break year for young talent. If Wall is truly a budding young star, he needed to have a breakout year.
Would a free agent be more excited about playing with Wall or Kyrie Irving? Wall is hoping his injury won’t keep him out for the entire season, Irving is playing like a superstar. Out of sight, out of mind.
The Wizards have not done nearly enough to give hope to the fan base since Leonsis took over. They got rid of the morons, drafted Wall, and traded for Nene. That’s about it. With people already questioning if Leonsis is committed to building the Wizards into a winning franchise, a report saying he turned his back on a player like Harden because he was too expensive just adds fuel to the fire. The Wizards brought in Emeka Okafor and Trevor Ariza, but Harden is where you draw the line?
There’s no guarantee Harden would be playing as well in DC as he is in Houston and even then Houston is only seventh in the West. Still, the Wizards look absolutely pathetic. Harden would have given fans something to watch while waiting for Wall. Now, the Wizards have nothing to draw the fans. A $50 ticket to watch Jan Vessely and Jordan Crawford is a tough sell. Even when Wall does come back, he certainly won’t be able to save the season. It’s not even Christmas yet, but the season already feels lost.
Of course all of this is easy for me to say, it’s not my $80 million. After years of turmoil and pathetic seasons, however, you have to prove to your fan base that you are committed to making the team better. When you pass up an opportunity to bring in Harden because he would cost too much, it sends the wrong message to fans and potential free agents. If bringing in players like Harden isn’t part of the plan, maybe it’s time to make a new plan.
Do you think James Harden could have helped?
Last week, it was leaked by several anonymous sources that the Wizards passed up a deal for James Harden in the offseason. Sources vary on what Oklahoma City was asking for with some reports saying it would have taken Bradley Beal and Chris Singleton and others saying the Thunder wanted an established player as part of the deal. The Wizards, however, walked away.
What was the issue? Money. The sources again vary on the specifics. The Washington Post reported that the Wizards would have been subject to the luxury tax with the addition of Harden’s contract. Other outlets reported that owner Ted Leonsis did not want to commit $80 million to Harden. Leonsis has come out and denied both reports.
I am always hesitant to argue that an owner is not committed to building a winning franchise, but this looks really bad. Owners are usually successful businessmen who are savvy enough to understand that winning teams put people in seats. There are always exceptions to the rule and I know there are dysfunctional franchises with terrible owners out there, but I have a hard time believing this is one of those cases.
Leonsis rebuilt the Capitals from one of the least profitable organizations to one of the most popular teams in the NHL. He did it by giving out big contracts to star players, but the team went through a lengthy rebuilding process to get there. I am sure the blueprint for the Wizards is probably pretty similar.
The problem is that the NBA is a different animal than the NHL. The NBA is the most star driven sports league in America. When you have the chance to bring one in at a relatively cheap price, you have to pull the trigger, especially when have no other way of attracting stars to come to the team.
Right now, there is no reason for a star player to sign in DC. The team is terrible and DC is not really considered a “basketball” town. When a star has a chance to sign with Miami, Boston, the Lakers, or Washington, in most cases the Wizards are going to be on the bottom of that list.
How do teams like Oklahoma City grow into a powerhouse? They draft a star to build around. Once that player establishes himself, it becomes easier to entice other players to sign with you. No doubt that was the team’s plan with Wall which makes the timing of his injury potentially devastating. The third year is often a make or break year for young talent. If Wall is truly a budding young star, he needed to have a breakout year.
Would a free agent be more excited about playing with Wall or Kyrie Irving? Wall is hoping his injury won’t keep him out for the entire season, Irving is playing like a superstar. Out of sight, out of mind.
The Wizards have not done nearly enough to give hope to the fan base since Leonsis took over. They got rid of the morons, drafted Wall, and traded for Nene. That’s about it. With people already questioning if Leonsis is committed to building the Wizards into a winning franchise, a report saying he turned his back on a player like Harden because he was too expensive just adds fuel to the fire. The Wizards brought in Emeka Okafor and Trevor Ariza, but Harden is where you draw the line?
There’s no guarantee Harden would be playing as well in DC as he is in Houston and even then Houston is only seventh in the West. Still, the Wizards look absolutely pathetic. Harden would have given fans something to watch while waiting for Wall. Now, the Wizards have nothing to draw the fans. A $50 ticket to watch Jan Vessely and Jordan Crawford is a tough sell. Even when Wall does come back, he certainly won’t be able to save the season. It’s not even Christmas yet, but the season already feels lost.
Of course all of this is easy for me to say, it’s not my $80 million. After years of turmoil and pathetic seasons, however, you have to prove to your fan base that you are committed to making the team better. When you pass up an opportunity to bring in Harden because he would cost too much, it sends the wrong message to fans and potential free agents. If bringing in players like Harden isn’t part of the plan, maybe it’s time to make a new plan.
Monday, December 17, 2012
Redskins’ Short-term and Long-term Gamble Pays Off
The Redskins raised more than a few eyebrows last April when
in the fourth round the team drafted Michigan State quarterback, Kirk Cousins. They had drafted Robert Griffin III as
the second overall pick to be their franchise QB. Why waste the pick on another rookie QB?
Fast-forward to week 14. The Redskins trailed the Ravens by eight with a chance
for the division title perhaps on the line. Suddenly, as Griffin scrambled away from pressure, Haloti Ngata
hit him so hard that he seemingly separated Griffin’s body from his knee. Fans held their collective breath as
Griffin hobbled down the field, trying to keep the drive and perhaps the season
alive.
It soon became clear he would not be able to finish out the
game. Enter Kirk Cousins.
Cousins came in cold, but went 2 for 2 and hit Pierre Garcon
in the end zone for a touchdown.
He capped it all off with a two-yard draw for the game tying two-point
conversion. The Redskins had tied
it up and forced overtime where Kai Forbath sealed the 31-28 win.
On Saturday, after a week of watching and waiting, the
Redskins announced that Cousins would start against the Brows. After a very slow start and an
interception that led to Cleveland’s first touchdown, Cousins strung together
an efficient, very impressive game.
He completed 26 of 37 passes for 329 yards and two touchdowns as the
Redskins defeated the Browns 38-21.
He did it under immense pressure both on and off the
field. It’s hard to step in for a
new hero. Cleveland’s defense also
came in with an aggressive game plan.
With no Griffin, they decided they were going to blitz early and often. He took some shots, but he got the job
done.
While drafting Cousins may have seemed odd, it did make a
certain amount of sense. In the later rounds, NFL teams make picks based on
value rather than just on need alone.
When a second round caliber QB drops to the fourth round you have an
opportunity to steal a real playmaker.
It does not always work out that way, but every draft pick comes with a
certain amount of risk.
It’s not about a lack of confidence in Griffin, it’s about
having a better backup option than Rex Grossman and having a very valuable
trade asset in the future.
It was definitely a gamble. The Redskins have been dressing only two rookie QBs all
season. There was no guarantee
Cousins would be up to the task if Griffin ever went down. With Grossman inactive most weeks,
there would be no one else to turn to if Cousins could not handle the NFL level. The gamble, however, appears to have
paid off.
While Cousins is no Griffin, he has shown that he can be
more than just a dependable backup.
We would all like to see Griffin come back as soon as possible, but
there is no reason to rush him.
Now, he has another full week to heal and if his knee still is not
better by next week, playing Cousins feels like much less of a risk than he did
only a few days ago.
The backup QB is an often overlooked position, but every
team is always one play away from needing one. Cousins has shown why it is important to have someone
dependable on your depth chart behind the starter. As a rookie, his ceiling is still high which means his value
is as well. In his one game and
two brief appearances, he already looks better than any QB on Arizona or the
Jets’ roster. Cousins’ payoff will
not just be on the field. Expect
to see some offers in the offseason.
Teams will pay a lot for what they see as a possible franchise QB. As the Redskins have few draft
picks and are up against a cap penalty, it will be worth listening to what
other teams have to offer.
Every QB has bad games and Cousins will be no
exception. When the Redskins
needed him, however, he stepped up and got the big win. Should they need him again, Shanahan no
doubt will name him starter with more confidence then perhaps he had last week.
For all the latest DC sports news, check me out on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
For all the latest DC sports news, check me out on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
Monday, December 10, 2012
College Football Season Capped off by Ridiculous Postseason Format
The college football season will be settled yet again by an
arbitrary matchup between two teams we are pretty sure deserve to be
there. While a four-team playoff
is on the way in 2014, many of the problems that plague college football’s
postseason will remain.
In 1992, the BCS was created out of necessity to pit two
teams together in a national championship game. Since teams and conferences had bowl affiliations, the two
best teams would rarely play one another to end the season. As a result, it was difficult to
determine an overall national champion.
The new system was an upgrade, but as we have seen nearly
every single year this two-team system remains far too exclusive. This year, Alabama will play Notre Dame
in the National Championship Game.
Alabama is one of five teams in the BCS top 25 with one loss. Alabama may seem to most people as the
best one-loss team, but in reality there is very little that separates them
from the others.
What’s worse is that there could have been multiple
undefeated teams at the end of the season. If Notre Dame, Alabama, Kansas State, and Oregon had all
gone undefeated, two of those four would have been excluded. This nightmare scenario happened in the
2004-05 season. Southern
California, Oklahoma, and Auburn were all undefeated. With nothing to separate the three and with a two-team
system, Auburn was somehow excluded.
Just as a quick aside, can you imagine an SEC team going undefeated
today and NOT getting a place in the National Championship game?
Somehow, the BCS managed to survive until last season when
enough was enough and it was announced the format for the national championship
will change into a four-team playoff.
While this is progress, it still does not go far enough.
I know it sounds like I am beating a dead horse by tearing
apart a system that has been universally panned, but that’s not the point. The purpose of this article is not to
point out the obvious flaws that have already been discussed ad nauseam, but
instead to highlight the fact that instituting a four-team playoff is like putting a
band-aid on a broken arm.
Let’s take the top four teams in the BCS standings this year
as a hypothetical playoff. This
would give us Notre Dame, Alabama, Florida, and Oregon. One could argue that all four teams are
deserving of a title shot. This
would, however, also exclude one loss Kansas State who I would argue is no less
deserving. You are left with the
exact same problem of a two-team system: it still excludes teams just as
deserving of a title shot as those selected.
But wait, doesn’t college basketball have the same
problem? Every year experts debate
over the most deserving teams and some are inevitably left out of March
Madness. Won’t any system have
the exclusion problem no matter how big?
While this is true, the difference is that the 69th best
basketball team in the nation cannot reasonably argue that they are legitimate
national championship contenders. The lowest seed to
ever win March Madness was an eight when Villanova won in 1985. There is a huge difference between leaving
out the 69th best team and the fifth.
Still, the powers that be drag their feet on a full-blown
playoff system. Most people want
to see either eight or 16 teams battle it out, but the fans are given the most
ridiculous arguments for why this won’t happen.
Since the football season ends at the end of
November/beginning of December, a playoff system could potentially interfere
with then end of the college semester.
Well, the FCS (formerly I-AA football) has been using a playoff system of
eight teams or more since 1981. Somehow
not every FCS football player has dropped out of school. I promise you the football schedule
could be adjusted to accommodate academics.
Another argument is that playoffs would either end the bowl
system or diminish their importance.
This is untrue for two reasons.
First, the bowls could be incorporated into a playoff system. For example, the four current BCS bowls
could be converted into quarterfinal games. Whatever bowls are not incorporated could be played by teams
not in the playoffs. The NCAA
could make it work.
Secondly, a playoff system would not diminish bowl games any more
than sponsors already have. Do you
think players can say with pride that they are playing in the Famous Idaho
Potato Bowl? Or how about the
Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl? When I
see bowls like the Beef ‘O’ Brady’s Bowl, it seems pretty evident that people
stopped caring about the prestige of the bowl system a long time ago. Adding a playoff system really won’t
hurt, unless of course you’re a big fan of the San Diego County Credit Union
Poinsettia Bowl (my personal favorite).
Perhaps the most compelling and only real argument there is
against the playoff system is that it could diminish the regular season. I admit, the regular season of college
football is the most important of pretty much any sport. Every
game turns into a pseudo “playoff” game for national title hopefuls. A single loss can end the dream of
raising the crystal trophy.
The problem, however, is that the big teams know their
season hangs in the balance every week and so they schedule patsies they can
beat up on while preparing for conference opponents. Here are some of the matchups we were given in week 12 of
this season: Alabama vs. Western Carolina, Florida vs. Jacksonville State,
South Carolina vs. Wofford, Georgia vs. Georgia Southern, Auburn vs. Alabama
A&M, Texas A&M vs. Sam Houston State, and Kentucky vs. Samford. Even the most casual of college
football fans can see these are pretty lackluster games. Almost the entire SEC decided to
take the weekend off and THIS is the
regular season we have to protect?
With all due respect to the FCS, people are not glued to the TV when the best conference in the nation decides to hold a series of scrimmages in the middle of the season. The nonconference schedule for many teams is becoming a joke because the margin for error is so small. I personally would rather see postseason games against the best teams in the country instead of Alabama’s backups blowout Western Carolina midseason.
With all due respect to the FCS, people are not glued to the TV when the best conference in the nation decides to hold a series of scrimmages in the middle of the season. The nonconference schedule for many teams is becoming a joke because the margin for error is so small. I personally would rather see postseason games against the best teams in the country instead of Alabama’s backups blowout Western Carolina midseason.
Don’t despair though, a larger playoff format is not far
behind. The fact is that college
football is dominated by money. If
you don’t believe me, go back and re-read the names of the bowls I listed. It won’t take long for people to
realize that more playoff games between the best teams in the nation will mean
more money. It’s a simple
equation. What’s not so simple,
however, is determining a fair system that can finally include all the true
national title contenders while keeping all the decision-makers happy, but that’s
an argument for another day.
For the latest DC Sports news, follow me on Twitter @TheDC_Sportsguy
Sunday, December 2, 2012
Nationals Bring in Span, Still have Decisions to Make
The Nationals made their first big move in the offseason,
addressing their need for a leadoff hitter.
The team announced Thursday that they had traded pitching
prospect Alex Meyer to Minnesota in exchange for center fielder Denard
Span. With a .284 batting average
and a .357 on-base percentage, Span looks to be the leadoff hitter the Nationals sorely needed.
Not only did the Nationals add a key piece to their lineup,
they also gained some flexibility regarding Adam LaRoche and Michael
Morse. Heading into the offseason,
it seemed unlikely the Nationals would keep both. Now it's all but certain.
LaRoche is coming off arguably the best season of his
career, with 33 home runs and 100 RBIs.
He won both a Golden Glove and a Silver Slugger and was undoubtedly the
team MVP in 2012.
The problem is that he is a free agent. While he has expressed interest in
returning to Washington, he also has reportedly asked for a three-year
deal. At 33 years old, the
Nationals are reluctant to lock him up for so long at what will undoubtedly be
a hefty price tag.
Morse, on the other hand, is still under contract and
younger at 30. Injuries, however,
are a major concern as they have hindered the power-hitter for much of his career.
If the Nationals don’t re-sign LaRoche, Morse would move to
first base, but the Nationals would be taking a huge risk with
Morse’s durability. They would also be
losing LaRoche for nothing. Trading Morse will at least get them something in return.
The Nationals put together a winning roster in 2012 and I
would be reluctant to let the biggest reason for that, the team MVP, walk away
for nothing. Yes, you take the
risk of his numbers declining because of his age, but no more of a risk than
you take with Morse's health.
The Nationals also find themselves in need of a starting
pitcher this offseason. The biggest name
available is of course Zack Grienke, but I would be shocked if the Nationals
had any serious interest in him.
Grienke would reportedly cost around $100 million. With Stephen Strasburg and Gio Gonzalez
already in the rotation, Grienke would be third at the very least, maybe even
fourth behind Jordan Zimmermann.
Don’t hold your breath for this blockbuster signing in DC.
In addition to a starter, the Nationals will also look for a
left-handed reliever. With the
decision to non-tender Tom Gorzelanny, the Nationals have no left-handed relievers
on the roster. They could re-sign
Sean Burnett or Michael Gonzalez, but I would not be surprised to see them
bring in a new name as well.
For the latest DC Sports new, follow me on Twitter at TheDC_Sportsguy
For the latest DC Sports new, follow me on Twitter at TheDC_Sportsguy
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)