In the BCS era, six conferences were given automatic bids
into the BCS games. The conference
champions of the ACC, Big 10, Big 12, Big East, Pac 10, and SEC were all
guaranteed to receive a bid to one of the five BCS bowls. Now that college football appears to finally
be headed towards a playoff system, it is unclear what the BCS bowl games will
mean. By agreeing to a bowl matchup with
one another similar to the relationship we currently see between the Big 10 and
Pac 10 regarding the Rose Bowl, the SEC and Big 12 have cemented a relationship
between two of the major conferences in the nation. The implication is that the top four
conferences have distinguished themselves and turned their backs on the weaker
ACC and Big East.
Conference realignment and the end of the BCS system is a
turning point for the ACC. The league
has long been criticized as weak with a 2-13 record in BCS bowl games. The new playoff system is expected to be a
four team format and in the past 5 years only one ACC team would have
qualified, Virginia Tech in 2007. The
ACC must get better if it is to compete nationally or its best teams could
leave.
Just last week, there were rumors floating that perhaps
Florida State was seeking to leave for the Big 12. While Florida State shot down those rumors,
it did show the precarious position in which the ACC now finds itself. With little prestige to speak of, should one
of the ACC powers decide to leave it could start a mass exodus. Should Florida State leave, Miami, Virginia
Tech, and Clemson could all seek to leave as well or other conferences could
attempt to lure them away. The ACC
cannot afford to lose its few prominent teams or it may be forced to seek out
other unlikely teams like the Big East did in their talks with TCU, Boise State,
and Houston.
Should the ACC respond to these other matchups with a Big
East Bowl matchup? That would not really
help anything. In fact, it would
probably cement the perception that both conferences are second-tier. One other possibility for the ACC is that
they could attempt to woo Notre Dame.
Notre Dame of course is one of the most storied programs in the
nation. They have for years scorned all
attempts to bring them into a conference, but previously there was no need for
them to join a conference with their special relationship with the BCS. That status, however, is now in
jeopardy. Should the playoff format
require each of the top four teams to be conference champions as some have
suggested, where would that leave Notre Dame?
If they must seek a conference, the ACC would be a distinct
possibility. The Notre Dame program is
extremely profitable and the school is reluctant to share that money among
conference members. The ACC does not
have a revenue sharing agreement which would allow Notre Dame to keep its money
even with its conference affiliation.For those of you dreaming of a rekindling of the “Catholics and Convicts” rivalry between Notre Dame and Miami, don’t reserve your tickets just yet. This is a long-shot. Even if Notre Dame is not the Notre Dame of old, a playoff format without some sort of special provision for them is almost inconceivable. They will not join a conference unless they absolutely have to and it is unlikely that they ever will.
For now, the ACC is best served to remain where they stand and see what happens with the new playoff system. To try and build around a playoff system that has not even been finalized yet is putting the cart before the horse. Syracuse and Pittsburgh have yet to make their ACC debut, both may thrive in the new conference. The new agreement between the Big 12 and SEC is not necessarily cause for panic, it only confirms what we already knew. Right now, the ACC is second tier. With two new teams and a new playoff system, the ACC may find a new identity and finally establish itself as a major conference. If not, they may have to seek other teams to bridge the gap.
No comments:
Post a Comment